Fri Jul 9 15:27:00 GMT 2004
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 16:05, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Painful, isn't it?
> Tools like strace or gdb could help. You might need to add printf's to
> the code to see where it dies.
The one gdb/strace I have are 32 bits and don't seem to help that much
in my case. I could recompile them in 64 bits but then I would be unable
to run them (because of ld64.so). Unless I compile them in static mode
Well maybe glibc 2.3.2 is a bit outdated for PPC 970 and some support is
missing. It seems to be aver 1 year old. We are going to try the latest
from CVS just to check.
BTW, it seems that in (future) glibc 2.3.3, a new test for "altivec" was
added in configure which make the crosstool "build_gcc_header" hack fail
(for G5 at least).
Jean-Christophe Dubois <email@example.com>
Mercury Computer Systems
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to firstname.lastname@example.org
More information about the crossgcc