puzzled on how to integrate arm kernel patch(es) into crosstool
Mon Jan 19 18:16:00 GMT 2004
Ken Wolcott wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is exclusively an arm-specific kernel header missing
> issue or whether it is specific to at91. One of the developers was unable to
> build his arm (at91?) specific code without adding a directory of arm
> specific header files (obtained from a 2.95.3 arm environment) and changing
> the symlink:
> modified the link "arch" to point at "arch-at91" rather
> than "arch-integrator".
Aha. Can you send me a test file from that developer I can use to
check whether my toolchain comes with the right include files?
One that doesn't compile with the vanilla crosstool?
> Now the code compiles -- but where is the "pristine" source of this? would
> the rmk patch
> have this code? I suspect not, as reading this email
> So I feel like I am on the verge of success with having a fully-functional
> arm cross-compiler using crosstool (v0.25)...
Yeah, sounds like you're close. I'll try to pay attention to the
thread you linked to.
> Next I need to build a minimal embedded environment (ptx again?)...
Yes, the wonderful ptxdist. You should look at its patch repository;
they may have already solved this very problem.
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to email@example.com
More information about the crossgcc