puzzled on how to integrate arm kernel patch(es) into crosstool

[Ken Wolcott]

Hi Dan;

  I'm not sure if this is exclusively an arm-specific kernel header missing 
issue or whether it is specific to at91.  One of the developers was unable to 
build his arm (at91?) specific code without adding a directory of arm 
specific header files (obtained from a 2.95.3 arm environment) and changing 
the symlink:

.../arm-arm9-linux-gnu/sys-include/asm/arch-at91

modified the link "arch" to point at "arch-at91" rather
than "arch-integrator".

Now the code compiles -- but where is the "pristine" source of this?  would 
the rmk patch 
ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/patch-2.4.21-rmk1.bz2
have this code?  I suspect not, as reading this email

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-January/019067.html

  So I feel like I am on the verge of success with having a fully-functional 
arm cross-compiler using crosstool (v0.25)...

  Next I need to build a minimal embedded environment (ptx again?)...

Thanks,
Ken


On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:22, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Kegel wrote:
> > Ken Wolcott wrote:
> >>   I've noticed a deficiency in my arm crosstool toolchains...no
> >> arm-specific kernel header files
>
> I should ask - are any really needed, just to build the tools?
> What problems do you run into without them?
> - Dan


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com