puzzled on how to integrate arm kernel patch(es) into crosstool

Ken Wolcott ken.wolcott@med.ge.com
Mon Jan 19 17:34:00 GMT 2004

Hi Dan;

  I'm not sure if this is exclusively an arm-specific kernel header missing 
issue or whether it is specific to at91.  One of the developers was unable to 
build his arm (at91?) specific code without adding a directory of arm 
specific header files (obtained from a 2.95.3 arm environment) and changing 
the symlink:


modified the link "arch" to point at "arch-at91" rather
than "arch-integrator".

Now the code compiles -- but where is the "pristine" source of this?  would 
the rmk patch 
have this code?  I suspect not, as reading this email


  So I feel like I am on the verge of success with having a fully-functional 
arm cross-compiler using crosstool (v0.25)...

  Next I need to build a minimal embedded environment (ptx again?)...


On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:22, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Kegel wrote:
> > Ken Wolcott wrote:
> >>   I've noticed a deficiency in my arm crosstool toolchains...no
> >> arm-specific kernel header files
> I should ask - are any really needed, just to build the tools?
> What problems do you run into without them?
> - Dan

Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

More information about the crossgcc mailing list