puzzled on how to integrate arm kernel patch(es) into crosstool
Mon Jan 19 17:34:00 GMT 2004
I'm not sure if this is exclusively an arm-specific kernel header missing
issue or whether it is specific to at91. One of the developers was unable to
build his arm (at91?) specific code without adding a directory of arm
specific header files (obtained from a 2.95.3 arm environment) and changing
modified the link "arch" to point at "arch-at91" rather
Now the code compiles -- but where is the "pristine" source of this? would
the rmk patch
have this code? I suspect not, as reading this email
So I feel like I am on the verge of success with having a fully-functional
arm cross-compiler using crosstool (v0.25)...
Next I need to build a minimal embedded environment (ptx again?)...
On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:22, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Kegel wrote:
> > Ken Wolcott wrote:
> >> I've noticed a deficiency in my arm crosstool toolchains...no
> >> arm-specific kernel header files
> I should ask - are any really needed, just to build the tools?
> What problems do you run into without them?
> - Dan
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to firstname.lastname@example.org
More information about the crossgcc