crosstool-0.27 demo-arm.sh fail
Marius Groeger
mgroeger@sysgo.com
Fri Feb 27 14:58:00 GMT 2004
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Marius Groeger wrote:
> > bootloaders or the kernel). Just because different -mXXX-float were
> > used.
>
> Interesting.
To say the least :-) I don't really want to blame it on any particular
package (ie. gcc or binutils), but it's definitely weird to talk about
hardware FP in case of routines doing integer calculation...
> > The only problem I ran into was compiling u-boot, and there I just
> > drop the -msoft-float (with care and grinding teeth, admittedly).
>
> (? So when do you use -msoft-float now?)
Not at all, actually.
> > BTW Dan, have you tried the softfloat patched gcc on an ARM V4 system,
> > ie. _not_ XScale?
>
> No. I've hardly tried it anywhere at all. In fact, I haven't even
See my other posts on the matter. The patch in question makes GCC call
the AS with cpu=xscale. With good reason it seems, as the softfloat
routines don't compile with anything less. So I believe that patch is
only suitable for --with-cpu=xscale gcc's.
Regards
Marius
--
Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
Project Manager
SYSGO Real-Time Solutions AG | Embedded and Real-Time Software
Am Pfaffenstein 14
55270 Klein-Winternheim, Germany
Voice: +49-6136-9948-0 | FAX: +49-6136-9948-10
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list