crosstool enhancement

[Roman Duka]

Daniel Kegel wrote:

> As it happens, cygwin uses ash as its default noninteractive shell,
> so I certainly want to support ash.
> 
> I did a lot of work porting ltp to run under busybox's ash, so
> I'm very sympathetic to these issues.  Maybe I'll even test
> using busybox ash as the shell, what the heck.  It's a bit low
> on the priorities, though.

hey i've just done a test on a previously compiled busybox binary, 
invoking ash and running test -h works as it should, so i was wrong, but 
you never know what sort of shell the user will be running, it's better 
to take care of every little possible glitch


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com