gcc-3.3 VS gcc-2.95.3 soft floating point on mipsel?
Daniel Kegel
dank@kegel.com
Fri Aug 13 18:22:00 GMT 2004
David Wuertele wrote:
> Dan> There is a softfloat patch floating (heh) around for gcc-3.3.3,
> Dan> but you'd probably be better off using gcc-3.4.1, which has the
> Dan> patch already applied. Can you try 3.4.1?
>
> I've just kicked off a make using 3.4.1. Is glibc-2.3.2 still the
> glibc of choice to use with gcc-3.4.1?
Yes, though if you run into any problems, there are lots of
fixes sitting in glibc cvs (e.g. glibc-2.3.3, which hasn't
really been released, but was tagged in December).
> I have had problems with binutils-2.15, but 2.14 seems to work okay
> for me. Is there a compelling reason to try a later binutils?
Not that I recall. My strategy is 'use it until it breaks, then upgrade'.
- Dan
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list