gcc-3.3 VS gcc-2.95.3 soft floating point on mipsel?

[David Wuertele]

Dan> There is a softfloat patch floating (heh) around for gcc-3.3.3,
Dan> but you'd probably be better off using gcc-3.4.1, which has the
Dan> patch already applied.  Can you try 3.4.1?

I've just kicked off a make using 3.4.1.  Is glibc-2.3.2 still the
glibc of choice to use with gcc-3.4.1?

I have had problems with binutils-2.15, but 2.14 seems to work okay
for me.  Is there a compelling reason to try a later binutils?

Dave


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com