the mechanics of unpacking the source for a toolchain
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday@mindspring.com
Tue Sep 30 07:28:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > but what about any of those components already existing in
> > an exploded directory (good example -- kernel source.) what do
> > you do then?
>
> Assume it's already patched. This will be the case if
> you're using CVS, say. Any patches you still need,
> you should apply to your local tree (and scream bloody
> murder until they make it into the CVS tree :-)
wait a minute. so if one of the source variables points, not to
a tarball, but to an actual directory, you should assume that
directory has already been patched? why? i'm not disagreeing,
it's just not clear to me why you'd take this position.
rday
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list