Output file size?

[Toralf Lund]

Toralf Lund wrote:

> Peter Barada wrote:
>
>>> Any idea why gcc's output is that much larger? Is there any way I 
>>> can reduce the size? Note that -Os helps a bit, but I suspect that 
>>> it actually destroys the code (asm() isn't handled correctly.)
>>>   
>>
>>
>> How does GCC 'destroy' the 68k code when using -Os?  An example would be
>> quite appreciative.
>>
> Inline assembly code (specified via asm()) is simply missing from the 
> assembly file generated by 'm68k-coff-gcc -Os -S'. At least, that what 
> it looks like for one of my actual C files. I'll try with a simplified 
> example...

Actually, this may have been justified as the code would appear to do 
nothing because I had made a mistake when setting up the variable templates.

I'm not sure I want the optimiser to touch my assembly code at all, 
though...

- Toralf



------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com