no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
Ken.Wolcott@med.ge.com
Thu Nov 6 16:56:00 GMT 2003
Hi Dan;
But if binutils configure siliently refuses to support --with-sysroot, then
it won't write anything to the path provided by --with-sysroot and the final
gcc compile has nothing to read from in .../usr/include and therefore it
doesn't do anything. My arm9 toolchain is still has the --prefix paths in it
rather than the --with-sysroot paths in it. My developer wants the paths to
be /general/tools/gnu/arm9/gcc-3.2.1/usr/bin (and respective for lib) rather
than the directory structure crosstool generates. I was hoping
--with-sysroot would solve this problem. I'm hoping I don't have to mess
with the spec file. It looks like we are lucky in the fact that gcc and
friends are all named arm-arm9-linux-gnu-* and we will only have one version
of gcc at a time, then when gcc looks around for companion programs it
doesn't find the i686 ones...it looks like it doesn't matter whether it is
statically linked or not any more either since they are heavily using -I and
-B in the make...
Thanks,
Ken
On Thursday 06 November 2003 02:19, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I've been hearing about --with-sysroot for about a year, and it's
> even documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html,
> but tonight I finally went looking for it -- and it's not in
> gcc-3.3.2, as far as I can tell! The latest gcc-3.4 snapshot
> has it. Did I just not look in the right place? Or is there
> a patch everyone knows about but me that adds it to gcc-3.3.2?
> - Dan
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list