Comparing Bill and Karim's cross-compile scripts. Updating Bill's to gcc 3.2.3.

[Dan Kegel]

Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> I know. I've tried googling around and I found this:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2002-October/023612.html
> It seems mailman just can't obscur the addresses in the archives ...
> I'd gladly adopt any solution you may have.

That was 2.0, but 2.1 is out, and it works.
We're using it here; addresses in our archives are obscured.
See http://www.lula.org/pipermail/lula/2003-May/thread.html

>>My toolchain MUST be built from an automated script under source control.
>>There is simply no choice; our business requires it.
> 
> 
> That's an interesting situation. I guess I never thought a "MUST"
> could apply here. Can you expand a little bit more on why this is so?

We build everything from source control.  It's the only way to
have reproducibility.  I believe this is a requirement for ISO9000,
but it's also just common sense.  Or haven't you caught the
source control religeon yet? :-)
- Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com