Comparing Bill and Karim's cross-compile scripts. Updating Bill's to gcc 3.2.3.

[Dan Kegel]

Dan Kegel wrote:
> 388: Karim fixes up paths in ld.so, but Bill doesn't.
> Need to remove absolute paths from the ld.so in ${TARGET_PREFIX)/lib;
> maybe Bill just forgot to mention that?

Man, I'm getting confused.  glibc-2.1 had a binary as ld.so.
I *think* glibc-2.2 has a text file for ld.so, and the corresponding
binary is ld.so.1.
Maybe when Bill wrote his script, the little text ld.so hadn't
been introduced yet?
- Dan



------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com