Interpreting gcc-3.3 "make check" results

[Dan Kegel]

Ken Rose wrote:
>>I'm testing gcc-3.3/glibc-2.3.2, and I forgot to use the -k option
>>to 'make check', so it terminated on the first failure.
> 
> -k is a new one for me.  When did it appear?

1985 or so.  It just means 'keep running make even if one target fails'.
It's used in e.g. contrib/regression/btest-gcc.sh

"man pmake" says
      -k      Continue processing after errors are encountered, but only on
              those targets that do not depend on the target whose creation
              caused the error.

> Unfortunately, I don't have any magic recipe for dealing with test
> failures.  It seems that you just need to look at them one at a time and
> figure out what went wrong, and then decide what to do about it.

Yup.  And see what others have done about 'em.

- Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com