order of constructors

[Bill Gatliff]

Guys:


Does this work?

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.2/gcc/C---Attributes.html#C++%20Attributes


b.g.



Bill Randle wrote:

>On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 18:10, Peter Barada wrote:
>  
>
>>Is there any way to control the order of static constructors so that
>>some that access other functions are done after those functions
>>intializing fucntions are done?
>>
>>I guess I'm really asking is there any way to collect together a group
>>of static constructors and then have them 'constructed' *after* some
>>initialization functions for objects/libraries that they refer to have
>>been called? 
>>
>>-- 
>>Peter Barada
>>peter@the-baradas.com
>>    
>>
>
>The way I've done that in the past is to put all the static constructors
>that are order dependent into a single file - say StaticGlobals.cc -
>then compile this file and link it in with everything else. The order
>of construction is the order in which they are listed in the file.
>(At least this was the case last time I did it.)
>
>	-Bill Randle
>	billr@neocat.org
>
>
>
>------
>Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
>Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
>
>  
>

-- 
Bill Gatliff
In the dark on embedded GNU?  Step into the light.
bgat@billgatliff.com



------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com