are glibc hacks in crosstool still necesary?
Dan Kegel
dank@kegel.com
Wed Aug 20 20:59:00 GMT 2003
Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> --- Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
>
>>Generally, when bringing up a new version of gcc or
>>glibc, I start out without any patches, and bring in just
>>the ones I need as I run into the problems. So the pile of
>>patches I end up with depends on which architectures I built
>>and tested on...
>
> A good methodology, IMHO. At the moment I'm sort of
> trying to distill as simple as possible a recipe for
> building a cross-compiler, thus my question about
> whether the extra stuff was necessary.
Excellent - we have the same goal. Care to review
my crosstool script and let me know if it's doing anything
silly?
Also, are you intending to run the regression tests, too?
> I may simply
> try to find a good source of prebuilt glibcs though
> too...
Good luck there. Depends on what platforms you need, I guess,
and whether you trust other people's patching and testing habits.
- Dan
--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list