Gcc 3.0.3: target powerpc-*-eabi

David Korn dkorn@pixelpower.com
Fri Jan 11 22:49:00 GMT 2002


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen [mailto:Antti-Pekka.Virjonen@computec.fi]
>Sent: 11 January 2002 14:13


> If I compile with -S and look at the assembler sources, the only
>difference between the gcc generated code between -meabi and -mno-eabi
> -options is the different alignment of the stack. With both options, 
>the call to __eabi is there.
>
>Is there something wrong with the Gcc 3.0.3 or is it just me ?

  If you use both options I don't know which one wins the conflict, so
there's nothing necessarily wrong with it adding the call in that case.
But it definitely shouldn't add the call if you've used -mno-eabi!

  It might be the case that some line of the specs file is adding -meabi
to the compiler flags, and that -meabi overrides -mno-eabi, in which case
the specs file is at fault.  Otherwise, it seems very clear that this is
a genuine bug in gcc that you should report to the gcc-bugs list or 
using the form at gcc.gnu.org

   cheers,
    DaveK
-- 
Burn your ID card!  http://www.optional-identity.org.uk/
Help support the campaign, copy this into your .sig!




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com



More information about the crossgcc mailing list