QUESTION: strange behaviour of typedef enum and __attribute__((packed)) using sh-hms-g++ 3.0.3

[William A. Gatliff]

Fabio:


> If I define
> typedef enum en {em_f1 = 0, em_f2, em_f3} em_t 
> __attribute__(((packed),aligned(1)));

What happens if you leave the aligned(1) off?


b.g.
-- 
Bill Gatliff
Public embedded GNU and embedded Linux training dates announced!
http://billgatliff.com

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com