arm-aout vs arm-elf
Mon Oct 15 07:26:00 GMT 2001
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >If I do xxxxx/confiugre --target=arm-elf ..., I will get apcs-32,
> >correct settings of cpp defaults and properly configured multilib.
> >If I do xxxx/configure --target=arm-aout ..., I will get apcs-26,
> >hardlfoat default for cpp and no multilib, BTW it will happen regardless
> >of `with-cpu' settings.
> >I do not think that this is desired outcome.
> Why not? Those two targets are not supposed to be in any way identical.
> The arm-aout target has existed since the beginning of time, and its default
> options were appropriate to the time it was created. On the other hand,
> arm-elf is much newer and its default options reflect that.
I do not think that this is acceptable, difference between aout and
elf should be in output file format only - at least it has to be a big
warning about these problems printed by configure.
BTW, is it possible to configure arm-aout for apcs-32/soft-float by
providing --with-xxxx parameters to configure ?
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to email@example.com
More information about the crossgcc