GNUpro vs GCC

[law@redhat.com]

  In message < 87bsmkltia.fsf@panther.aladdin.de >you write:
  > 
  > On 07/16/2001 09:08:37 AM CST law wrote:
  > >
  > >  In message < 87elrhko7d.fsf@panther.aladdin.de >you write:
  > >  > >I believe the correct approach is to ask Red Hat (assuming they were 
  > the
  > >  > >authors) to contribute their code to the public sources.  Once that h
  > as
  > >  > >been done then you can work on fixing/improving it.
  > >  >
  > >  > This was the reason of my license question 2 postings ago. But it's
  > >  > maybe the best idea to ask Redhat themselves.
  > >Contributing the Z8000 backend to the public sources would not present
  > >any problem for Red Hat.  I have in fact given the code to a few folks
  > >over the years who had expressed an interest in cleaning it up and
  > >contributing it.
  > 
  > What's the newest version of the z8k gcc code. I found
  > ecosSWtools-990319-src.tar.bz2  which contains the z8k support. I
  > assume this one is the newest?
Unknown.  Cygnus/Red Hat hasn't done anything with the z8k code in several
years.  I don't recall when we actually removed it from our source repository
though.

jeff


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com