[postmaster@sourceware] AS-BUG????????

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Thu Nov 9 09:22:00 GMT 2000

Please remove crossgcc-owner from future email.  There is no reason
to send your discussion to the owner of the list.

Thank you.

On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:05:27PM +0100, Sobhy Gad wrote:
>hi again,
>as I allredy said I as-2.95.2 has a BUG.
>absolut  jumps does not work. only with the verion as-2.9.1 it works
>very good.
>	.long	label_y
>	jmp	label_x
>	:
>	:
>when I compile it with 2.9.1 it works good. any other verion does NOT
>this is the result of as-2.95.2 for jmp label_x is:
>41F9 0000 0000. 
>as you see >> 0000 0000 << should be a distence to the label
>it does not calculate the jump.
>the same with     .long label_y    is tranlated as 0000 0000
>insted of the addresse of label_y.
>but when you load the label to an addresse register let us say a0 and
>jump	(a0)
>it works.
>STRANGE, is'nt it ?????????
>I think there is a bug with the absolute JUMPS.
>best regards
>S. Gad

Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

More information about the crossgcc mailing list