Weirdness in disassembly

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:19:33PM +0200, Michael Chapman wrote:
> [...]
> My mistake somewhere. Not sure when though. The opcode 
> for the 32 bit instruction is the same as that for 
> the 16 bit variant of it (well it was in how I had typed
> it)! 
> 
> Fixed that now. And I now get the correct disassembly.

Good stuff.
CGEN would benefit from improved detection of this sort of error.
If you were to generate a simulator kernel, you'd have been told of
the ambiguity.

> Now what values should I have for the instruction lengths?
> Obviously at least one of them has to be 16 bits for
> not skipping over to much when decoding junk.

Since a real program should not contain junk, a specific choice for
the other variables is not that important.  Go with whatever
working numbers you prefer.  The base-insn-size is the biggie.


- FChE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/cgen/attachments/20020927/49ad3e0f/attachment.sig>