field-start and varying word sizes

[Doug Evans]

Geoff Keating writes:
 > Despite the comment, m32r has 
 >   (insn-lsb0? #f)
 > and so all this code comes down to the trivial case anyway.

The comment was directed towards the kind of chip the m32r is.
You're taking the comment too literally.

 > OK to commit?

I'm not convinced. [not saying I can't be, just that I'm not there yet]

What should be returned in the following case? [for example]

lsb0? #f
wanted-word-len 32
recorded-word-len 16
endian little