macho gas support
Iain Sandoe
iain@sandoe.co.uk
Mon May 25 09:46:11 GMT 2026
Hi Alan,
> On 25 May 2026, at 10:35, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ix86-darwin is the only remaining macho target supported by gas. I'm
> not sure how much it is used nowadays, and judging by the number of
> x86 tests and mach-o tests that fail, it seems no one is actively
> maintaining the code. So it's quite possible this series of patches I
> made fixing some issues was wasted time. My interest in the port
> started with seeing a regression from commit cc28c46227cd. Fixing
> that led to finding more problems.
Actually, the x86 binutils can be quite useful - I do build it from time-to-time
but not regularly (i.e. I keep the built tools for end-use).
> Of the three patches, I'm less confident in the correctness of the
> last one. I do know that it is necessary to ignore subsections in at
> least obj_mach_o_force_reloc_sub_same, otherwise even the simplest
> assembly testcases won't assemble with -gdwarf2, but there may be some
> other situation where it is wrong to ignore subsections when
> processing debug info.
I will try to look at and test this - over the next week or two - is there a branch somewhere
I can checkout?
> I haven't tried to build gcc for i386-darwin, if that is even
> possible.
trunk is possible with a work-around for HJ’s bootstrap break caused by changes
to stack_chk_guard.
I build and test i686-darwin17 regularly and and the m32 mulilib on x86_64-darwin17
less frequently i686-darwin9 and x86_64-darwin10 and 16 with the 32b multilib,
So all open branches should bootstrap - and trunk will with a work-around.
thanks for working on this, I just don’t have the resources to do binutils as well
as GCC,
Iain
>
> --
> Alan Modra
More information about the Binutils
mailing list