[PATCH v2 1/4] Update list of supported AMDGPU architectures

[Jan Beulich]

On 08.05.2026 11:59, Lancelot SIX wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/05/2026 09:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> [You don't often get email from jbeulich@suse.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>>
>>
>> On 07.05.2026 21:43, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>> From: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com>
>>>
>>> This patch updates the list of supported AMDGPU architectures in bfd/
>>> binutils/ and include/elf/.
>>>
>>> The following architectures have been added:
>>>
>>> - gfx942
>>> - gfx950
>>> - gfx1150
>>> - gfx1151
>>> - gfx1152
>>> - gfx1153
>>> - gfx1200
>>> - gfx1201
>>> - gfx1250
>>>
>>> The following architectures have been removed:
>>>
>>> - gfx940: The compiler no longer supports it.

If this was saying "The compiler never supported it", ...

>> Is this a good idea? What's wrong with readelf still recognizing it?
>>
>> Jan
> 
> I would not mind keeping it, but I really don't expect anyone will ever 
> encounter such binaries in the wild.

... I could follow you here. Can this be clarified, please?

Jan

> The Reference page for this[1] lists 0x040 as "Reserved", so if we want 
> to keep binutils/readelf in sync with it, I'd be for removing this entry.
> 
> If you prefer to keep it, that is fine by me.
> 
> Best,
> Lancelot.
> 
> [1] https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#amdgpu-ef-amdgpu-mach-table