RFC: Annotate immediates in x86 disassembly

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Jan,

> Already when reading Michael's v1 comment I wondered: How's handling of
> multiple comments going to work?

Yeah .. I don't know :-)

> Surely we want to switch the present
> %rip-relative operand printing to the new cappend_*() model.

That was going to be my next step.

> Hence both
> that and an immediate may want to have a comment added. Presumably those
> would want to appear in the same order as the operands, which are
> printed in different order for AT&T vs Intel syntax.

Ah, OK, this is beyond my x86 expertise.  Maybe a real x86 maintainer
would like to take over ?

Cheers
   Nick