[PATCH v3 00/13] RISC-V: assorted fixes and (hopefully) improvements

Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com
Fri Jun 19 11:45:25 GMT 2026


There may not be many dependencies among the patches, but the issues
were all noticed more or less together (i.e. while addressing one,
the next one popped up). I've not made an attempt at sorting the V vs
Z?inx issue, as per Andrew's request.

Quite a few further points are made in remarks in individual patches.
Input there is very welcome.

Jiawei kindly reviewed v1 and v2, and I meanwhile committed a few more
patches from there, which I assumed were pretty sure to be reasonably
uncontroversial. For the others I'd prefer RISC-V maintainer approval,
yet I'm not going to wait indefinitely.

There aren't many changes in v3. See individual changes for what
changed, if anything.

01: RISC-V: add dedicated vector arithmetic .insn forms
02: RISC-V: EEW64 checking
03: bfd/RISC-V: Zvfbfwma implies Zvfbfmin
04: RISC-V: Zv{b,k}* imply Zve32x
05: RISC-V: drop FCVT.Q.L{,U} forms with rounding mode operand
06: RISC-V: make FP rounding mode an optional argument
07: RISC-V: check operands for Zdinx in RV32
08: RISC-V: check operands for Zqinx
09: RISC-V/gas: .attribute vs .insn
10: RISC-V/gas: warn about non-boolean unaligned-access attribute
11: RISC-V/gas: warn about non-power-of-2 stack-align attribute
12: RISC-V/bfd: warn about non-boolean unaligned-access attribute
13: RISC-V/bfd: warn about non-power-of-2 stack-align attribute

I'd also like to point out that [1] continues to be pending. I'm
far from insisting that that patch be taken, but something needs
doing about the issue.

Jan

[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-March/126601.html


More information about the Binutils mailing list