[PATCH] ld: xfail pr29655 on SPARC [PR34151]

[Alan Modra]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 11:20:39AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> As described in PR ld/34151, the recent "Build pr29655" test FAILs on
> SPARC, both Solaris and Linux.
> 
> Until this is fixed, this patch xfail's the test.
> 
> Tested on sparc{v9,}-sun-solaris2.11, sparc{64,}-unknown-linux-gnu, and
> amd64-pc-solaris2.11.
> 
> Ok for trunk?

OK.

> This failure is the only one keeping the Solaris/SPARC buildbots from
> going green.  To allow them to easily report future issues, it would be
> good if this could go in.
> 
> Besides, Frank reported in the PR that RISC-V shows the same failure.  I
> wonder how to deal with that?  I guess it would be best to file a
> separate PR for that.
> 
> Thanks.
> 	Rainer
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
> 
> 
> 2026-06-14  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
> 
> 	ld:
> 	* testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp (Build pr29655): xfail on SPARC.
> 

> # HG changeset patch
> # Parent  e141951be61bea33828b504b5eceba9499e14d0e
> ld: xfail pr29655 on SPARC [PR34151]
> 
> diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp
> --- a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp
> +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp
> @@ -1878,6 +1878,8 @@ run_cc_link_tests [list \
>  # PR 29655 (cont.): Check that in PIC code linked as PDE taking the address
>  # of a function defined in a DSO results in the function address (from GOT)
>  # and not the "canonical PLT" address from the PDE.
> +# PR ld/34151
> +setup_xfail sparc*-*-*
>  run_cc_link_tests [list \
>      [list \
>  	"Build pr29655" \


-- 
Alan Modra