RFA: Fix potential memory leak in gen-sframe.c

[Jens Remus]

On 7/28/2026 10:54 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Indu,
> 
>   Is the patch below OK ?  It updates the sframe_xlate_ctx_cleanup()
>   function so that it also zeroes out the other fields in the
>   sframe_xlate_ctx structure.
> 
>   Disclaimer: I used an AI tool (claude) to locate the problem being
>   fixed by this patch, but I wrote the patch myself.  Ie I did not use
>   AI to write the patch.
> 
>   The problem reported looks like this:
> 
>     1. sframe_do_fde() (line 2490) populates xlate_ctx->first_fre with
>        allocated FRE entries and sets xlate_ctx->num_xlate_fres > 0.
>        
>     2. On failure for a signal frame (line 2491-2496),
>        sframe_xlate_ctx_cleanup() frees the FRE chain (line 1096) but
>        does not null first_fre or reset num_xlate_fres. Then err is
>        forced to SFRAME_XLATE_OK.
>        
>     3. Since err is now OK, sframe_xlate_ctx_finalize() (line 2507)
>        copies the dangling first_fre pointer and stale count into the
>        output SFrame FDE structure.
>        
>     4. The FDE with dangling pointer is linked into the output list
>        (lines 2508-2509) and its freed data is later written to the
>        output .sframe section.
> 
>   So, do you agree with this analysis and is the proposed patch a
>   sufficient solution ?

Not Indu, but replying as I was involved in SFrame V3 development:

I can confirm that above causes a segmentation fault and below fixes it.

See my just sent "[PATCH 0/2] gas: sframe: Fix for flefible FDE and new
test":
https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/20260729163445.2563223-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com/

> diff --git a/gas/gen-sframe.c b/gas/gen-sframe.c
> index b5c8f649bea..6d1cafa63bf 100644
> --- a/gas/gen-sframe.c
> +++ b/gas/gen-sframe.c
> @@ -1094,6 +1094,9 @@ static void
>  sframe_xlate_ctx_cleanup (struct sframe_xlate_ctx *xlate_ctx)
>  {
>    sframe_row_entry_free (xlate_ctx->first_fre);
> +  xlate_ctx->first_fre = NULL;
> +  xlate_ctx->last_fre = NULL;
> +  xlate_ctx->num_xlate_fres = 0;
>    XDELETE (xlate_ctx->remember_fre);
>    xlate_ctx->remember_fre = NULL;
>    XDELETE (xlate_ctx->cur_fre);
Maybe also reset the flexible FDE flag:

	xlate_ctx->flex_p = false;

Regards,
Jens
-- 
Jens Remus
Linux on Z Development (D3303)
jremus@de.ibm.com / jremus@linux.ibm.com

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Ehningen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/