binutils 2.45.90.20260125 test results
Jens Remus
jremus@linux.ibm.com
Wed Jan 28 10:24:18 GMT 2026
Hello Matthias!
On 1/28/2026 10:30 AM, Jens Remus wrote:
> On 1/28/2026 9:33 AM, Indu wrote:
>> On 2026-01-27 10:24 p.m., Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>>> s390x:
>>> ======
>>>
>>> Running /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/binutils/ testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp ...
>>> FAIL: replacing non-deterministic member (wrong size, expected: 920)
>>>
>>> Running /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/ld/testsuite/ ld-elf/shared.exp ...
>>> FAIL: pr26580-3
>>> FAIL: Run pr19719 fun defined
>
> Those two are known to fail for a long time and are most likely
> unrelated. I do have a TODO to work on resolving those.
>
>>>
>>> Running /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/ld/testsuite/ ld-s390/s390.exp ...
>>> FAIL: PLT: PLT generation without .eh_frame unwind info
>>> FAIL: PLT: PLT generation with .eh_frame unwind info
>>> FAIL: SFrame simple link
>>> FAIL: SFrame for plt0 and pltN
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Matthias.
>>
>> I am not able to reproduce these in my local cross s390x builds on x86_64 and aarch64.
>>
>> buildbot logs of a recent run show PASS for the above
>> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/81/builds/5618/steps/6/logs/ld_sum
>>
>> Are there more detailed logs for the above fails?
Could it be that you have ASLR enabled and this is caused by PR 33852:
https://sourceware.org/pr33852
Could you please try whether reverting commit 11e5824cda9f ("make frag
fr_type a bitfield") resolves the issue?
Thanks and regards,
Jens
--
Jens Remus
Linux on Z Development (D3303)
jremus@de.ibm.com / jremus@linux.ibm.com
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Ehningen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/
More information about the Binutils
mailing list