ld: testsuite: Add sframe test for PR 33401

[Jan Beulich]

On 16.01.2026 14:18, Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 2:47 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> On 16.01.2026 13:15, Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 2:04 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 16.01.2026 12:57, Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 1:42 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This fails for me with
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: cannot find -lm: No such file or directory
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: have you installed the static version of the m library ?
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: cannot find -lgcc_s: No such file or directory
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: have you installed the static version of the gcc_s library ?
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: cannot find -lc: No such file or directory
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: have you installed the static version of the c library ?
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: cannot find -lgcc_s: No such file or directory
>>>>>> /build/binutils/master-git/2026-01-16/ld/.libs/ld-new: have you installed the static version of the gcc_s library ?
>>>>>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>>
>>>>> Please can you give me more context here.
>>>>
>>>> I would have provided more if I knew what else is needed. I assume my
>>>> g++ is a little oldish, but tests should work regardless of compiler
>>>> version (or they should make sure a minimum required version is
>>>> present). My assumption is that newer g++ knows to imply -nostdlib
>>>> when invoking relocatable links, but apparently my one doesn't.
>>>
>>> Probably you use custom CXXFLAGS/CFLAGS while testing.
>>
>> I don't, at least not knowingly. But as said, this part is easy to solve
>> by adding -nostdlib. The other part, when the readelf output is actually
>> checked, is what I'm in trouble with. The more that iirc Alan already
>> said that there being no R_*_NONE might actually be a good thing. IOW I
>> can't even tell why the test fails when there is that "No R_*_NONE in
>> .rela.sframe" early return path, which - as said - isn't taken in my case.
>> There's a very wild guess of mine that the polarity of the check there
>> might be inverted, yet then you surely would have noticed that?
> 
> 
> To test the PR33401 issue, I need to make sure there is a R_*_NONE in
> the sframe from the first link.

Where would that come from? (To re-phrase the earlier: Why am I not seeing
one?)

Jan