[PING] Two OOB read vulnerabilities in bfd/xcofflink.c — requesting CVE assignment
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Sat Feb 28 05:36:20 GMT 2026
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 03:46:21PM +0800, The mist·CJM wrote:
> I recently reported two separate heap-buffer-overflow (OOB read)
> vulnerabilities in bfd/xcofflink.c to security@sourceware.org,
> with detailed analyses and PoCs attached:
I haven't seen that email. Is there a security@sourceware.org
mailing list? Note that binutils/SECURITY.txt specifies two other
mailing lists for security related bugs, and CVE assignment.
>
> 1.OOB read at xcofflink.c:1919 (xcoff_link_add_symbols,
> csects[] out-of-bounds access)
>
>
> 2. OOB read at xcofflink.c:2282 (xcoff_link_add_symbols, r_symndx
> out-of-bounds access)
Please verify that this fixes your out-of-bounds accesses.
* xcofflink.c (xcoff_link_add_symbols): Properly bounds check
XTY_LD x_scnlen index. Sanity check r_symndx before using it
to index sym hashes.
diff --git a/bfd/xcofflink.c b/bfd/xcofflink.c
index fde21c9f958..1781182fa6a 100644
--- a/bfd/xcofflink.c
+++ b/bfd/xcofflink.c
@@ -1908,12 +1908,9 @@ xcoff_link_add_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
follow its appropriate XTY_SD symbol. The .set pseudo op can
cause the XTY_LD to not follow the XTY_SD symbol. */
{
- bool bad;
-
- bad = false;
- if (aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64
- >= (size_t) (esym - (bfd_byte *) obj_coff_external_syms (abfd)))
- bad = true;
+ bool bad = (aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64
+ >= ((esym - (bfd_byte *) obj_coff_external_syms (abfd))
+ / symesz));
if (! bad)
{
section = xcoff_data (abfd)->csects[aux.x_csect.x_scnlen.u64];
@@ -2279,6 +2276,7 @@ xcoff_link_add_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
functions imported from dynamic objects. */
if (info->output_bfd->xvec == abfd->xvec
&& *rel_csect != bfd_und_section_ptr
+ && (unsigned long) rel->r_symndx < obj_raw_syment_count (abfd)
&& obj_xcoff_sym_hashes (abfd)[rel->r_symndx] != NULL)
{
struct xcoff_link_hash_entry *h;
--
Alan Modra
More information about the Binutils
mailing list