[PING^2][PATCH v5 00/12] PR ld/24600: Add general linker support for mapless archives
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@redhat.com
Fri Feb 20 17:49:25 GMT 2026
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026, Fangrui Song wrote:
> I sent a message at Wed, Nov 19, 2025, 11:40 PM, which likely got
> blocked because I used maskray@sourceware.org (supposed to be a
> receive only address) as a sender
> """
> If you send an updated series, I hope the --link-mapless option can be
> renamed to avoid confusion with -M/-Map :)
>
> I believe the option length doesn't really matter as it would not be
> used often - and at some point will become legacy
>
> > -M /-M --print-map Print a link map to the standard output.
> > -Map=mapfile /-Map Print a link map to the file mapfile.
> """
It wasn't blocked, cf.
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/CAN30aBFcFvrJVtneHhmYpwRYr_u_emifbYy0DkCiXYFEkYc4_g@mail.gmail.com/>,
and I replied to your earlier message concerning this matter, cf.
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/a1c5693a-2943-ecb6-030c-ae59a5f3e59b@redhat.com/>,
soliciting feedback from other members of the binutils community. No one
seemed to share your concerns, the change has been approved and I fail to
see why the options would be confusing. It's up to the user to know their
tools and these options have been fully documented.
Maciej
More information about the Binutils
mailing list