gas: abort in new_logical_line_flags
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Tue Feb 17 07:18:59 GMT 2026
On 17.02.2026 00:33, Alan Modra wrote:
> .linefile 0.
>
> hits the "case 1 << 3" abort in new_logical_line_flags with line_number
> of -1.
>
> Similar to commit b60f6a628897, this fixes the abort by extending the
> meaning of .linefile in user code to restore the physical line for
> ".linefile 0 .".
>
> * input-scrub.c (new_logical_line_flags <case 1<<3>): Don't
> abort on negative line number, instead restore physical line
> for ".linefile 0".
>
> diff --git a/gas/input-scrub.c b/gas/input-scrub.c
> index afb80ef2ce0..2b90632040b 100644
> --- a/gas/input-scrub.c
> +++ b/gas/input-scrub.c
> @@ -495,7 +495,12 @@ new_logical_line_flags (const char *fname, /* DON'T destroy it! We point to it!
> /* FIXME: we could check that include nesting is correct. */
> break;
> case 1 << 3:
> - if (line_number < 0 || fname != NULL)
> + /* s_linefile conditionally decrements the line depending on
> + whether '\n' is seen. */
Hmm, should we perhaps suppress the decrement there when linenum is 0? Or
even reject such a use as nonsensical? What buffer_and_nest() inserts is
a positive number in all (correct) cases. "Correct" because line + 1 can
of course wrap, yet I'd again deem such a use bogus. (Really numbers up
from INT_MAX are problematic, as get_linefile_number() takes a pointer to
plain int.) And .linefile isn't intended for use in user code anyway, so
we're pretty free to reject forms we wouldn't generate ourselves.
Jan
> + if (line_number < 0
> + || (line_number == 0 && input_line_pointer[-1] != '\n'))
> + line_number = physical_input_line;
> + if (fname != NULL)
> abort ();
> if (next_saved_file == NULL)
> fname = physical_input_file;
>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list