RISC-V: Support Svrsw60t59b extension.
Jiawei
jiawei@iscas.ac.cn
Wed Feb 4 11:41:37 GMT 2026
> > diff --git a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
> > index ee962b4f6f1..a206dc73e4c 100644
> > --- a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
> > +++ b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
> > @@ -1595,6 +1595,7 @@ static const struct riscv_supported_ext riscv_supported_std_s_ext[] =
> > {"svinval", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > {"svnapot", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > {"svpbmt", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > + {"svrsw60t59b", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > {"svvptc", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > {"ssqosid", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > {"ssnpm", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT, 1, 0, 0 },
> > diff --git a/gas/NEWS b/gas/NEWS
> > index e384d1135c0..4536e4b3e83 100644
> > --- a/gas/NEWS
> > +++ b/gas/NEWS
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Changes in 2.46:
> > * Solaris/PowerPC target support is removed.
> >
> > * Add support for RISC-V standard extensions:
> > - sdtrig v1.0, ssstrict v1.0.
> > + sdtrig v1.0, ssstrict v1.0, svrsw60t59b v1.0.
> >
>
> If this doesn't rush, would it be better to be in 2.47 later since
> 2.46 branch was already created?
>
> Thanks
> Nelson
Okay, It's not rush, let's wait 2.47.
BR,
Jiawei
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20260204/3de4c5c0/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list