[PATCH] x86: rename avx10.1aux to avx10v1aux

[Jiang, Haochen]

> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2026 4:37 PM
> 
> On 19.08.2026 10:34, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
> >> From: Rohan Shenoy <RohanRadhesh.Shenoy@amd.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2026 4:18 PM
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> >> index 1ce5a063c67..b41eeeddc71 100644
> >> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> >> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> >> @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ static const arch_entry cpu_arch[] =
> >>    VECARCH (sm4, SM4, ANY_SM4, reset),
> >>    SUBARCH (pbndkb, PBNDKB, PBNDKB, false),
> >>    VECARCH (avx10.1, AVX10_1, ANY_AVX512F, set),
> >> -  VECARCH (avx10.1aux, AVX10_1_AUX, ANY_AVX10_1_AUX, set),
> >> +  VECARCH (avx10v1aux, AVX10_1_AUX, ANY_AVX10_1_AUX, set),
> >
> > Should we also change from AVX10_1_AUX to AVX10V1AUX and also
> > for cpu bit name avx10_1_aux to avx10v1aux?
> 
> If at all, only to avx10_v1_aux / AVX10_V1_AUX imo, to keep the identifiers
> readable. I'd question to value of the added 'v' / 'V' though.
> 

Oh. Mine. Jan is right here.

I messed GCC option naming trend with Binutils since I am actively working on
GCC patches recently. It should be avx10_v1_aux and AVX10_V1_AUX.

Thx,
Haochen