[PATCH v2] elf: Set this_idx to -1 for invalid relocations
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Mon Aug 3 12:51:51 GMT 2026
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 07:58:27AM +0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 7:43 AM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 02, 2026 at 08:55:00AM +0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 6:18 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When invalid relocation is reported by elf_link_read_relocs_from_section
> > > > called from lang_gc_sections:
> > > >
> > > > ld: pr34448-bug_18.o: bad reloc symbol index (0xf2000005 >= 0x13) for
> > > > offset 0x4 in section `.text.get_tls[get_tls]'
> > > >
> > > > the same error is reported again:
> > > >
> > > > ld: pr34448-bug_18.o: bad reloc symbol index (0xf2000005 >= 0x13) for
> > > > offset 0x4 in section `.text.get_tls[get_tls]'
> >
> > Using this_idx as a flag is a bad idea.
> >
> > I also think that no one should be too concerned about error messages
> > from fuzzed object files, so if you are going to fix this minor
> > problem do so in a way that won't potentially break the linker.
> >
>
> Then should linker stop when seeing a fuzzed object file, instead of keep
> going and crash later?
How is this relevant to a patch about duplicate error messages?
--
Alan Modra
More information about the Binutils
mailing list