[3/3] Adjust testcases for readelf printing 'foo@@'

[Jan Beulich]

On 20.11.2025 16:30, Michael Matz wrote:
> those are the public base-version symbols.
> ---
>  ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23161b.rd           | 6 +++---
>  ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr25617-1a-sec-hdr.rd | 4 ++--
>  ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr28348.rd            | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/pr23169a.rd         | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/pr23169b.rd         | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/pr23169c.rd         | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr22983.1.d        | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr22983.2.d        | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr22983.3.d        | 2 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr22983.4.d        | 2 +-
>  10 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Doesn't this need folding into one of the earlier patches, to avoid intermediate
fallout?

> --- a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23161b.rd
> +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23161b.rd
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  #...
> - +[0-9]+: +[a-f0-9]+ +0 +NOTYPE +GLOBAL +DEFAULT.* [0-9]+ +_?_(_bss_start|edata|end)
> + +[0-9]+: +[a-f0-9]+ +0 +NOTYPE +GLOBAL +DEFAULT.* [0-9]+ +_?_(_bss_start|edata|end)@?@?

Is it really correct to expect zero, one, or two @-s here? Don't you mean zero or
two?

Jan