[PATCH v0 06/15] readelf: add support to dump build attributes v2
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Tue Mar 11 08:12:40 GMT 2025
On 10.03.2025 18:51, Matthieu Longo wrote:
> --- a/binutils/readelf.c
> +++ b/binutils/readelf.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> #define BFD64
>
> #include "bfd.h"
> +#include "elf-attrs.h"
> #include "bucomm.h"
> #include "elfcomm.h"
> #include "demanguse.h"
> @@ -19456,6 +19457,263 @@ free_data:
> return res;
> }
>
> +static unsigned char *
> +display_attr_v2 (unsigned char * cursor,
> + const unsigned char * const end,
> + const char *subsec_name,
> + obj_attr_encoding_v2 value_encoding)
> +{
> + static const known_tag_v2 known_tags_aeabi_feature_and_bits [] =
> + {
> + {Tag_Feature_BTI, "Feature_BTI", {0}},
> + {Tag_Feature_PAC, "Feature_PAC", {0}},
> + {Tag_Feature_GCS, "Feature_GCS", {0}},
> + };
> + static const known_tag_v2 known_tags_aeabi_pauthabi [] =
> + {
> + {Tag_PAuth_Platform, "PAuth_Platform", {0}},
> + {Tag_PAuth_Schema, "PAuth_Schema", {0}},
> + };
> + static const known_subsection_v2 known_subsections[] =
> + {
> + {
> + .subsec_name = "aeabi_feature_and_bits",
> + .known_tags = known_tags_aeabi_feature_and_bits,
> + .optional = true,
> + .encoding = ULEB128,
> + .len = sizeof (known_tags_aeabi_feature_and_bits),
> + },
> + {
> + .subsec_name = "aeabi_pauthabi",
> + .known_tags = known_tags_aeabi_pauthabi,
> + .optional = false,
> + .encoding = ULEB128,
> + .len = sizeof (known_tags_aeabi_pauthabi),
> + },
> + };
> +
> + const known_subsection_v2 *
> + identify_subsection_ (const char* name)
> + {
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (known_subsections); ++i)
> + if (strcmp (name, known_subsections[i].subsec_name) == 0)
> + return &known_subsections[i];
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + const known_tag_v2 *
> + identify_tag_ (const known_subsection_v2* subsec,
> + uint32_t tag)
> + {
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < subsec->len; ++i)
> + {
> + const known_tag_v2 *known_tag = &subsec->known_tags[i];
> + if (known_tag->tag == tag)
> + return known_tag;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + uint32_t tag;
> + READ_ULEB (tag, cursor, end);
> +
> + const known_tag_v2 *tag_info = NULL;
> + const known_subsection_v2 *subsec_info = identify_subsection_ (subsec_name);
> + if (subsec_info != NULL)
> + tag_info = identify_tag_ (subsec_info, tag);
> +
> + if (tag_info != NULL)
> + printf (" Tag_%s: ", tag_info->name);
> + else
> + printf (" Tag_unknown_%u: ", tag);
> +
> + switch (value_encoding)
> + {
> + case NTBS:
> + cursor = display_tag_value (-1, cursor, end);
> + break;
> + case ULEB128:
> + cursor = display_tag_value (0, cursor, end);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return cursor;
> +}
> +
> +typedef struct {
> + bool err;
> + uint64_t read;
> +} BufferReadOp_t ;
> +
> +static BufferReadOp_t
> +elf_parse_attrs_subsection_v2 (unsigned char* cursor,
> + const uint64_t max_read,
> + const char* public_name)
> +{
> + BufferReadOp_t op = { .err = false, .read = 0 };
> +
> + const uint32_t F_SUBSECTION_LEN = sizeof(uint32_t);
> + /* The minimum subsection length is 5: 4 bytes for the length itself, and 1
> + byte for an empty NUL-terminated string, and no vendor-data. */
> + const uint32_t F_MIN_SUBSECTION_DATA_LEN = F_SUBSECTION_LEN + 1;
> +
> + if (max_read <= F_SUBSECTION_LEN)
> + {
> + error (_("Build attributes section ends prematurely\n"));
> + return op;
> + }
> + uint32_t subsection_len = byte_get (cursor, F_SUBSECTION_LEN);
> + op.read += F_SUBSECTION_LEN;
> + cursor += F_SUBSECTION_LEN;
> + if (subsection_len > max_read)
> + {
> + error (_("Bad subsection length (%u > max=%lu)\n"),
> + subsection_len, max_read);
> + // error, but still try to display the content until meeting a more serious error.
> + subsection_len = max_read;
> + op.err = true;
> + }
> + /* PR 17531: file: 001-101425-0.004 */
A comment like this, referencing a really old PR, suggests code is being copied
when - if at all possible - code would better be re-used (with refactoring as
necessary).
> + else if (subsection_len < F_MIN_SUBSECTION_DATA_LEN)
> + {
> + error (_("Subsection length of %u is too small\n"), subsection_len);
> + op.err = true;
> + return op;
> + }
> +
> + size_t subsection_name_len = strnlen ((char *) cursor, subsection_len) + 1;
> + if (subsection_name_len >= subsection_len)
> + {
> + error (_("Subsection name seems corrupted (missing '\\0')\n"));
> + op.err = true;
> + return op;
> + }
> + //if (subsection_name_len == 0)
> + // // do something here when the string is '\0'
What's this? Was this meant to be removed before submitting?
Jan
More information about the Binutils
mailing list