[PATCH v1] Microblaze: Widen mask used in opcodes/microblaze-dis.c

[Gopi Kumar Bulusu]

OK.

The incorrect address calculation happens on 64-bit hosts as 0xffff0000
remains a positive value.

I have not checked 32-bit hosts, but surely sign extension should work as
expected there.

gopi

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 7:35 PM Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com> wrote:

> Gopi --
>
> I'm out of the office until Jan 16.  I'll apply the patch when I return.
>
> I presume that the incorrect address calcluation only happened on 64-bit
> hosts.
>
> On 1/5/25 11:29 PM, Gopi Kumar Bulusu wrote:
> >
> >     From: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com <mailto:eager@eagercon.com>>
> >     To: binutils@sourceware.org <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
> >     Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:47:43 -0800
> >     Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Microblaze: Widen mask used in opcodes/
> >     microblaze-dis.c
> >     On 12/31/24 9:26 PM, Gopi Kumar Bulusu wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Gopi --
> >
> >     Do you have write access to the Binutils repo?
> >
> >     If you do, this patch is OK to check in.  Please add a comment
> >     in the git log.
> >
> >     If you don't, I'll apply this when I have an opportunity.
> >
> >
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > I don't have write access.
> >
> > Appreciate your help.
> > dhanyavadam
> > gopi
> >
>
> --
> Michael Eager
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20250107/afac0f0d/attachment.htm>