Binutils causes abnormally large, non-working binaries since 2.43
Bastiaan Timmer
basjetimmer@yahoo.com
Mon Feb 17 11:55:51 GMT 2025
(apologies for the noise, I believe I did not properly reply to the
mailing list earlier, so just correcting that)
I just realized: it is of course possible that just downgrading binutils
is not enough.
For example in my case, I noticed the size increase in a program I was
linking against openssl. Just downgrading binutils would not fix this,
unless I also recompiled openssl _after_ that downgrade. So, I of course
don't know anything about that JVM, but maybe it is possible its size
increase is due to one of its dependencies having bloated in size, and
that needs to be rebuilt with the old binutils version first.
kind regards,
Bas
On 17-02-2025 11:58, Julian Waters wrote:
> Unfortunately even binutils 2.42 still yields a Java Virtual Machine
> bloated to extreme sizes. It seems the 2 issues are unrelated.
>
> best regards,
> Julian
>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list