Binutils causes abnormally large, non-working binaries since 2.43
Bastiaan Timmer
basjetimmer@yahoo.com
Mon Feb 17 11:54:29 GMT 2025
(Apologies for the noise, I believe I failed to properly reply to the
mailing list with an earlier reply)
Thanks for your input. I've uploaded packages built with both 2.42 and
2.43 to a github repository here: https://github.com/bepaald/binutils_issue
I've also included the buildlogs and added a little description in the
README. Thanks again for looking at this!
kind regards,
Bas Timmer
On 17-02-2025 09:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Well. To at least stand a chance of figuring what changed in which way,
> can you please provide dumps of the crucial parts of both variants of
> the archive (constituents, and possibly of the constituents: headers,
> sections, and perhaps also symbols)? Yet better might be if you could
> upload both binaries somewhere, for people to do their own inspection.
> (Of course I say this without having a clue where the issue might be;
> others may have a clue and not require any extra information.)
>
> Jan
More information about the Binutils
mailing list