[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: move Jim Wilson to Past Maintainers

[Jim Wilson]

On Tue, 2025-08-26 at 02:49 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> writes:
> 
> > ..., effectively yielding IA-64 maintainer-less, as per his
> > request:
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-August/143393.html
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-August/143491.html
> > Jim - thanks much for your past work.
> > 
> 
> Jim, you're still listed as RISC-V maintainer. Do you wish to retain
> that status? (If so, not sure if we should move you out of "Past
> Maintainers").
> 
> You're also listed as maintainer for a few components in GCC. Do
> those
> need updating too?

I still care about RISC-V unlike IA-64.  I also still read some of the
RISC-V mailing lists.  So I can be a backup maintainer for RISC-V if
that is useful.  I can not be the primary maintainer.  That should be
Nelson Chu, at least last time I checked.  Andrew Waterman wrote the
original port, but I don't think that he has contributed in a long time
and he is probably not following the binutils mailing list.  Palmer
Dabbelt mostly works on other projects but is a reasonable backup to
Nelson, and then I can back up Palmer if necessary.

As for GCC, I should not be primary maintainer for anything, but I
don't think that I am.  I did resign as GCC IA-64 maintainer a few
years ago.  I just forgot to do that for Binutils at the same time.

To better state my current status, I retired and decided to take some
time off from GNU toolchain work.  I figured when I started getting
bored I would return.  But that was almost 4 years ago, and I haven't
gotten bored enough yet.  I'm still thinking I will return at some
point, but I have no idea when.

Jim