Inconsistent usage on onebyte_modrm and twobyte_modrm table in x86 disassembler and gdb?

[Jan Beulich]

On 27.08.2025 12:32, Schimpe, Christina wrote:
> Thanks a lot for working on this. I have followed this thread and also discussed this with Klaus a bit.
> I still wonder, would it make sense to align the logic in x86 disassembler and gdb ?

Well, fundamentally a function like amd64_get_insn_details() should live
in the disassembler (library). Just that, from all I know, the disassembler
isn't set up at all to hand out that kind of information. It would take
quite a bit of re-org to allow that to effectively be a byproduct (as it
ought to be, imo).

Jan