[PATCH v3] elf: Don't set sh_offset of .tbss sections beyond EOF

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Tue Apr 29 23:52:46 GMT 2025


On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 7:14 AM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 05:38:00AM +0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > If there is no .tdata section, put meaningless sh_offset of .tbss sections
> > without file contents somewhere within the first page, in an attempt to
> > not point past EOF and avoid sh_offset of zero.
>
> 1) Do we have any real world binaries where .tbss alignment is such
> that it places sh_offset for the section past all other following
> sections?  (.tbss has a lot of section following it, in contrast with
> .bss.)
> 2) Even if such binaries exist, do tools that manipulate the binary
> still have bugs in their SHT_NOBITS handling?
>
> ie. Is any of this necessary?

I don't know the answer.  Matthew, can you comment on these?

> I'm inclined to think we should consider going the opposite direction,
> removing the hack trying to prevent p_offset from being past
> end-of-file if (2) is no longer true.
>
> --
> Alan Modra



-- 
H.J.


More information about the Binutils mailing list