[PATCH 3/3] s390: Align instruction formats
Jens Remus
jremus@linux.ibm.com
Mon Sep 9 15:08:24 GMT 2024
Am 27.08.2024 um 13:43 schrieb Andreas Krebbel:
> On 8/26/24 17:47, Jens Remus wrote:
>> Rename instruction format RRF_R0RER to RRF_R0RER2, as it operand wise
>> more closely relates to RRF_R0RR2 instead of RRF_R0RR.
>>
>> This is a purely mechanical change.
>>
>> opcodes/
>> * s390-opc.c (INSTR_RRF_R0RER, MASK_RRF_R0RER): Rename to
>> {INSTR|MASK}_RRF_R0RER2.
>> * s390-opc.txt (RRF_R0RER): Rename to RRF_R0RER2.
>
> There was never supposed to be any relation between instruction formats
> with the same number. They get a number if there is already an
> instruction format with the same name. I don't think having a 2 version
> without having a version without the 2 would be more confusing.
Makes sense! I have fixed our internal tooling instead.
Regards,
Jens
--
Jens Remus
Linux on Z Development (D3303) and z/VSE Support
+49-7031-16-1128 Office
jremus@de.ibm.com
IBM
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des
Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Böblingen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/
More information about the Binutils
mailing list