[PATCH 3/3] s390: Align instruction formats

Jens Remus jremus@linux.ibm.com
Mon Sep 9 15:08:24 GMT 2024


Am 27.08.2024 um 13:43 schrieb Andreas Krebbel:
> On 8/26/24 17:47, Jens Remus wrote:
>> Rename instruction format RRF_R0RER to RRF_R0RER2, as it operand wise
>> more closely relates to RRF_R0RR2 instead of RRF_R0RR.
>>
>> This is a purely mechanical change.
>>
>> opcodes/
>>     * s390-opc.c (INSTR_RRF_R0RER, MASK_RRF_R0RER): Rename to
>>     {INSTR|MASK}_RRF_R0RER2.
>>     * s390-opc.txt (RRF_R0RER): Rename to RRF_R0RER2.
> 
> There was never supposed to be any relation between instruction formats 
> with the same number. They get a number if there is already an 
> instruction format with the same name. I don't think having a 2 version 
> without having a version without the 2 would be more confusing.

Makes sense! I have fixed our internal tooling instead.

Regards,
Jens
-- 
Jens Remus
Linux on Z Development (D3303) and z/VSE Support
+49-7031-16-1128 Office
jremus@de.ibm.com

IBM

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des 
Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der 
Gesellschaft: Böblingen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/


More information about the Binutils mailing list