[PATCH 3/3] [binutils/readelf] Fix handling of DW_MACRO_define_strx in dwo file
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Wed May 15 07:41:10 GMT 2024
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:55:22PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> When printing a DW_MACRO_define_strx entry in a .debug_macro.dwo section, we
> run into:
> ...
> DW_MACRO_define_strx lineno : 0 macro : <no .debug_str_offsets section>
> ...
>
> Fix this in display_debug_macro by passing the correct dwo argument to a
> fetch_indexed_string call.
>
> That works fine for readelf -w, with with readelf -wm we have:
> ...
> DW_MACRO_define_strx lineno : 0 macro : <no .debug_str_offsets.dwo section>
> ...
>
> Fix this in display_debug_macro by doing load_debug_section_with_follow for
> str_dwo / str_index_dwo sections instead of str / str_index sections when
> handling .debug_macro.dwo.
>
> PR 31735
> ---
> binutils/dwarf.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> .../binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.d | 11 +++++++++--
> .../binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.s | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/binutils/dwarf.c b/binutils/dwarf.c
> index f49989dc536..cdf73a7bc50 100644
> --- a/binutils/dwarf.c
> +++ b/binutils/dwarf.c
> @@ -6293,9 +6293,17 @@ display_debug_macro (struct dwarf_section *section,
> if (suffix && strcmp (suffix, ".dwo") == 0)
> is_dwo = true;
>
> - load_debug_section_with_follow (str, file);
> + if (is_dwo)
> + {
> + load_debug_section_with_follow (str_dwo, file);
> + load_debug_section_with_follow (str_index_dwo, file);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + load_debug_section_with_follow (str, file);
> + load_debug_section_with_follow (str_index, file);
> + }
> load_debug_section_with_follow (line, file);
> - load_debug_section_with_follow (str_index, file);
>
> introduce (section, false);
>
> @@ -6504,7 +6512,7 @@ display_debug_macro (struct dwarf_section *section,
> READ_ULEB (lineno, curr, end);
> READ_ULEB (offset, curr, end);
> string = (const unsigned char *)
> - fetch_indexed_string (offset, NULL, offset_size, false, 0);
> + fetch_indexed_string (offset, NULL, offset_size, is_dwo, 0);
> if (op == DW_MACRO_define_strx)
> printf (" DW_MACRO_define_strx ");
> else
> diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.d b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.d
> index 23581e70f3e..2f41f2331f2 100644
> --- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.d
> +++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.d
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> -#name: readelf -ws readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4
> +#name: readelf -wsm readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4
> #source: readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.s
> -#readelf: -ws
> +#readelf: -wsm
>
> Contents of the .debug_str.dwo section:
>
> @@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ Contents of the .debug_str_offsets.dwo section:
> Index Offset \[String\]
> 0 00000000 FIRST
> 1 00000006 SECOND
> +Contents of the .debug_macro.dwo section:
> +
> + Offset: 0
> + Version: 4
> + Offset size: 4
> +
> + DW_MACRO_define_strx lineno : 0 macro : FIRST
> diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.s b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.s
> index 68f64dde234..c28750bbe24 100644
> --- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.s
> +++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf-debug-str-offsets-dw4.s
> @@ -4,3 +4,10 @@
> .section .debug_str_offsets.dwo,"MS",@progbits,1
> .4byte 0
> .4byte 6
> + .section .debug_macro.dwo,"e",@progbits
> + .2byte 0x4 /* DWARF macro version number. */
> + .byte 0x0 /* Flags: 32-bit dwarf. */
> + .byte 0xb /* Define macro strx. */
> + .uleb128 0 /* At line number 0. */
> + .uleb128 0x0 /* .debug_str_offsets.dwo entry 0. */
> + .byte 0 /* End compilation unit. */
> --
> 2.35.3
OK, but please fix the @progbits problem in the testcase.
--
Alan Modra
More information about the Binutils
mailing list