binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi Sam,

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:28:46AM +0000, Sam James via Overseers wrote:
> For a while now, I've been wishing a binutils-cvs (or binutils-commits,
> whatever) list existed.
> 
> It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
> 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
> so it stopped getting notifications?

The pipermail archive still is getting updates:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils-cvs/

I think the issue is that mail is sent to bfd-cvs@sourceware.org.
That addressis rejected by inbox.sourceware.org (but seems to have a
special exception in mailman). So after the original import no new
messages (except some spam) have been added.

I filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31529
We should import the rest and add an alias (and/or change the mail
sending setup).

> Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
> like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?

binutils uses https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/

> [0] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils-cvs/ [1]