[PATCH 2/3] x86: disassembler macro for condition code
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Thu Jun 6 06:17:50 GMT 2024
On 06.06.2024 04:27, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
>>>> I did long ago ask for the documentation to be updated, to name all
>>>> (and in particular the more sensible) possible spellings, just like
>>>> is the case with other condition-code insns. I hope that the latest
>>>> when the insn is integrated into Vol 2 of the SDM, this will finally
>>>> happen. As to more
>>>
>>> Actually I am ok with both. Let me check with the documentation guy.
>>
>> I am ok with that. I suppose documentation will name that in the future.
>
> Could we hold this patch for a while? Someone internal just jump out against
> adding them. More discussion is needed. I am sorry for that :(.
Just on a vague "someone" / "something" - no, not really. If there are
counter arguments, please name them so they can be addressed. Otherwise
I'm pretty determined to have this in ahead of Lili's CCMPcc/CTESTcc
patch, which I expect may become ready with the next iteration.
Jan
More information about the Binutils
mailing list