[PATCH] gas: x86: ginsn: adjust ginsns for certain lea ops
Indu Bhagat
indu.bhagat@oracle.com
Tue Jan 23 09:38:55 GMT 2024
A review comment on the SCFI V4 series was to handle ginsn creation for
certain lea opcodes more precisely.
Specifically, we should preferably handle the following two cases of lea
opcodes similarly:
- #1 lea with "index register and scale factor of 1, but no base
register",
- #2 lea with "no index register, but base register present".
Currently, a ginsn of type GINSN_TYPE_OTHER is generated for the
case of #1 above. For #2, however, the lea insn is translated to either
a GINSN_TYPE_ADD or GINSN_TYPE_MOV depending on whether the immediate
for displacement is non-zero or not respectively.
Change the handling in x86_ginsn_lea so that both of the above lea
manifestations are handled similarly.
gas/
* gas/config/tc-i386.c (x86_ginsn_lea): Handle selected lea with
no base register similar to the case of no index register.
gas/testsuite/
* gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.l: New test.
* gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.s: Likewise.
* gas/scfi/x86_64/scfi-x86-64.exp: Add new test.
---
gas/config/tc-i386.c | 88 ++++++++++---------
gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.l | 32 +++++++
gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.s | 13 +++
gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/scfi-x86-64.exp | 1 +
4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.l
create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.s
diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
index 51166ef3f02..7810e1de40d 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -5666,6 +5666,8 @@ x86_ginsn_lea (const symbolS *insn_end_sym)
ginsnS *ginsn = NULL;
unsigned int base_reg;
unsigned int index_reg;
+ unsigned int src1_reg;
+ const reg_entry *src1;
offsetT index_scale;
unsigned int dst_reg;
@@ -5678,47 +5680,7 @@ x86_ginsn_lea (const symbolS *insn_end_sym)
GINSN_SRC_IMM, 0xf /* arbitrary const. */, 0,
GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg, 0);
}
- else if (i.base_reg && !i.index_reg)
- {
- /* lea -0x2(%base),%dst. */
- base_reg = ginsn_dw2_regnum (i.base_reg);
- dst_reg = ginsn_dw2_regnum (i.op[1].regs);
-
- if (i.disp_operands)
- src_disp = i.op[0].disps->X_add_number;
-
- if (src_disp)
- /* Generate an ADD ginsn. */
- ginsn = ginsn_new_add (insn_end_sym, true,
- GINSN_SRC_REG, base_reg, 0,
- GINSN_SRC_IMM, 0, src_disp,
- GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg, 0);
- else
- /* Generate a MOV ginsn. */
- ginsn = ginsn_new_mov (insn_end_sym, true,
- GINSN_SRC_REG, base_reg, 0,
- GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg, 0);
- }
- else if (!i.base_reg && i.index_reg)
- {
- /* lea (,%index,imm), %dst. */
- /* TBD_GINSN_INFO_LOSS - There is no explicit ginsn multiply operation,
- instead use GINSN_TYPE_OTHER. Also, note that info about displacement
- is not carried forward either. But this is fine because
- GINSN_TYPE_OTHER will cause SCFI pass to bail out any which way if
- dest reg is interesting. */
- index_scale = i.log2_scale_factor;
- index_reg = ginsn_dw2_regnum (i.index_reg);
- dst_reg = ginsn_dw2_regnum (i.op[1].regs);
- ginsn = ginsn_new_other (insn_end_sym, true,
- GINSN_SRC_REG, index_reg,
- GINSN_SRC_IMM, index_scale,
- GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg);
- /* FIXME - It seems to make sense to represent a scale factor of 1
- correctly here (i.e. not as "other", but rather similar to the
- base-without- index case above)? */
- }
- else
+ else if (i.index_reg && i.base_reg)
{
/* lea disp(%base,%index,imm) %dst. */
/* TBD_GINSN_INFO_LOSS - Skip adding information about the disp and imm
@@ -5732,6 +5694,50 @@ x86_ginsn_lea (const symbolS *insn_end_sym)
GINSN_SRC_REG, index_reg,
GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg);
}
+ else
+ {
+ /* lea disp(%base) %dst or lea disp(,%index,imm) %dst. */
+ gas_assert ((i.base_reg && !i.index_reg)
+ || (!i.base_reg && i.index_reg));
+
+ index_scale = i.log2_scale_factor;
+ src1 = (i.base_reg) ? i.base_reg : i.index_reg;
+ src1_reg = ginsn_dw2_regnum (src1);
+ dst_reg = ginsn_dw2_regnum (i.op[1].regs);
+ /* It makes sense to represent a scale factor of 1 correctly here
+ (i.e., not using GINSN_TYPE_OTHER, but rather similar to the
+ base-without-index case). */
+ if (!index_scale)
+ {
+ if (i.disp_operands)
+ src_disp = i.op[0].disps->X_add_number;
+
+ if (src_disp)
+ /* Generate an ADD ginsn. */
+ ginsn = ginsn_new_add (insn_end_sym, true,
+ GINSN_SRC_REG, src1_reg, 0,
+ GINSN_SRC_IMM, 0, src_disp,
+ GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg, 0);
+ else
+ /* Generate a MOV ginsn. */
+ ginsn = ginsn_new_mov (insn_end_sym, true,
+ GINSN_SRC_REG, src1_reg, 0,
+ GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg, 0);
+ }
+ /* TBD_GINSN_INFO_LOSS - There is no explicit ginsn multiply operation,
+ instead use GINSN_TYPE_OTHER. Also, note that info about displacement
+ is not carried forward either. But this is fine because
+ GINSN_TYPE_OTHER will cause SCFI pass to bail out any which way if
+ dest reg is interesting. */
+ else
+ {
+ gas_assert (i.index_reg);
+ ginsn = ginsn_new_other (insn_end_sym, true,
+ GINSN_SRC_REG, src1_reg,
+ GINSN_SRC_IMM, index_scale,
+ GINSN_DST_REG, dst_reg);
+ }
+ }
ginsn_set_where (ginsn);
diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.l b/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.l
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f4629f37fe1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.l
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+GAS LISTING .*
+
+
+ 1 ## Testcase with a variety of lea.
+ 2 .text
+ 3 .globl foo
+ 4 .type foo, @function
+ 4 ginsn: SYM FUNC_BEGIN
+ 5 foo:
+ 5 ginsn: SYM foo
+ 6 0000 488D05FE lea -0x2\(%rip\), %rax
+ 6 FFFFFF
+ 6 ginsn: ADD %r4, -2, %r0
+ 7 0007 678D4C18 lea -0x1\(%eax,%ebx\), %ecx
+ 7 FF
+ 7 ginsn: OTH %r0, %r3, %r2
+ 8 000c 678D4C58 lea 0x55\(%eax,%ebx,2\), %ecx
+ 8 55
+ 8 ginsn: OTH %r0, %r3, %r2
+ 9 0011 678D0C1D lea -0x3\(,%ebx,1\), %ecx
+ 9 FDFFFFFF
+ 9 ginsn: ADD %r3, -3, %r2
+ 10 0019 678D0C1D lea -0x3\(,%ebx,\), %ecx
+ 10 FDFFFFFF
+ 10 ginsn: ADD %r3, -3, %r2
+ 11 0021 678D0C5D lea -0x3\(,%ebx,2\), %ecx
+ 11 FDFFFFFF
+ 11 ginsn: OTH %r3, 1, %r2
+ 12 .LFE0:
+ 12 ginsn: SYM .LFE0
+ 13 .size foo, .-foo
+ 13 ginsn: SYM FUNC_END
diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.s b/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.s
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1861d069f39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-lea-1.s
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+## Testcase with a variety of lea.
+ .text
+ .globl foo
+ .type foo, @function
+foo:
+ lea -0x2(%rip), %rax
+ lea -0x1(%eax,%ebx), %ecx
+ lea 0x55(%eax,%ebx,2), %ecx
+ lea -0x3(,%ebx,1), %ecx
+ lea -0x3(,%ebx,), %ecx
+ lea -0x3(,%ebx,2), %ecx
+.LFE0:
+ .size foo, .-foo
diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/scfi-x86-64.exp b/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/scfi-x86-64.exp
index 2b291800b65..d32cb290d92 100644
--- a/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/scfi-x86-64.exp
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/scfi-x86-64.exp
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ if { ([istarget "x86_64-*-*"] && ![istarget "x86_64-*-linux*-gnux32"]) } then {
run_list_test "ginsn-dw2-regnum-1" "--scfi=experimental -ali"
run_list_test "ginsn-add-1" "--scfi=experimental -ali"
+ run_list_test "ginsn-lea-1" "--scfi=experimental -ali"
run_list_test "ginsn-pop-1" "--scfi=experimental -ali"
run_list_test "ginsn-push-1" "--scfi=experimental -ali"
--
2.43.0
More information about the Binutils
mailing list