Pushed: [PATCH] LoongArch: Don't falsely claim gold supported in toplevel configure

[Xi Ruoyao]

On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 11:37 +0800, chenglulu wrote:
> 
> 在 2024/2/23 上午11:27, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 11:16 +0800, chenglulu wrote:
> > > 在 2024/2/22 下午5:17, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > > > The gold linker has never been ported to LoongArch (and it seems
> > > > unlikely to be ported in the future as the new architectures are
> > > > focusing on lld and/or mold for fast linkers).
> > > > 
> > > > ChangeLog:
> > > > 
> > > >   	* configure.ac (ENABLE_GOLD): Remove loongarch*-*-* from target
> > > >   	list.
> > > >   	* configure: Regenerate.
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Ok for GCC trunk (to get synced into Binutils later)?
> > > I have no problem. But I have a question. Is this modification simply
> > > because we don’t
> > > 
> > > support it or is there an error somewhere?
> > If a user specify --enable-gold building Binutils, with loongarch in
> > this list the building system will attempt to build gold and fail.  If
> > removing loongarch from the list the building system will ignore --
> > enable-gold.
> > 
> Okay, I understand.

Pushed r14-9149 and the Binutils maintainer will pick it up before the
next Binutils release (AFAIK).

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University